Was the article changed since you read it? The first three paragraphs make it clear that this is an attempted reconstruction of events and clarifications/corrections/ are requested.
>Ever since the "Heartbleed" flaw in encryption protocol OpenSSL was made public on April 7 in the US there have been various questions about who knew what and when.
>Fairfax Media has spoken to various people and groups involved and has compiled the below timeline.
>If you have further information or corrections - especially information about what occurred prior to March 21 at Google - please email the author: bgrubb@fairfaxmedia.com.au. Click here for his PGP key.
Sorry, that just still looks like glossing it over.
I mean, when the NSA & other actors do NOT submit their data to this guy, they can say, it's complete now?
It just stinks to me like it's complacency. Just change your passwords & patch, & then don't worry, share everything again, it's private. In 2014, I don't think we're safe & private anymore at all. I can take the downvotes. I don't like it either.
>Ever since the "Heartbleed" flaw in encryption protocol OpenSSL was made public on April 7 in the US there have been various questions about who knew what and when.
>Fairfax Media has spoken to various people and groups involved and has compiled the below timeline.
>If you have further information or corrections - especially information about what occurred prior to March 21 at Google - please email the author: bgrubb@fairfaxmedia.com.au. Click here for his PGP key.