You're assuming that they consider the false positives to be disastrous (and tha... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		makomk on Dec 19, 2013 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: UK Porn filters block sex education websites You're assuming that they consider the false positives to be disastrous (and that they consider them to be false positives in the first place). That's not necessarily a safe assumption.

warfangle on Dec 20, 2013 [–]

I assume the simplest answer until proven otherwise. To do otherwise is to invite chemtrails.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact