Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

And who let them have full access to the system, using whatever command is available in the environment?
 help



The agents discovered a way out of the sandbox, which was supposed to be "air gapped".

It feels like you’re moving the goalposts here. If the question is, “Who should be liable for AI agents misbehaving,” I agree, it should be the end user that tasked the agent (in this case OpenAI). People are held liable for preventable accidents all the time, and in the case of employment law, torts can be brought against principals for actions an agent conducted on the principal’s behalf.

What your previous comment appeared to assert was that these systems had no independent agency to make decisions, which I think is clearly disproven by actual events. But perhaps I misread you


They don't have independent agency as "intelligent entities". They just probe whatever is available on the system, because they were trained to do so.

It's a large switch/case where the first available tool is picked up to do something they know how to do.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: