Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Normally, if there is sufficient evidence, both the mob boss and the ground level gangster are liable and criminally responsible for their crimes. You are free to disagree, but I don't see any reason why big tech companies should be completely immune from any and all responsibility for facilitating and taking a cut of the criminal activity taken on their territory.

You are also free to call it censorship, but I am not aware of any jurisdiction where fraud is considered protected speech, so as far as I'm concerned, censor away baby.



With your dictions, why the heck do you want the mob boss to be the cop deciding what you're allowed to do?


I want the mob boss to face legal consequences.

If they choose to get out of the business of facilitating crime because of that then so be it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: