> Are these loser companies who don’t want to cache on their end *Google* couldn... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

yjftsjthsd-h 14 days ago | parent | context | favorite | on: How to Block Some of the Bots

> Are these loser companies who don’t want to cache on their end

Google couldn't be bothered to cache; I would guess this before anything else.

https://drewdevault.com/blog/Google-has-been-DDoSing-sourceh...

Barbing 14 days ago [–]

> each IP address still clones the same repositories 8-10 times per hour.

Dumb! When was this fixed and don’t say never :)

inigyou 14 days ago | [–]

That just sounds like a CI system. Surely almost every one of us is responsible for at least one CI process that doesn't cache dependencies.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact