Yeah, and it kind of defeat passing PORT as a global variable. Like you might ex... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

hartator on May 12, 2025 | parent | context | favorite | on: Ruby 3.5 Feature: Namespace on read

Yeah, and it kind of defeat passing PORT as a global variable. Like you might expect PORT=2917 to do effect these apps ports.

JohnBooty on May 12, 2025 [–]

I'd call that some pretty bad behavior; behavior that I'd like to... if not dissuade, at least not encourage.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact