Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're not wrong. It's an artifact of rewriting the definition of reason into a sentence that begins with "Because the output ..."


I didn't mean the wording itself; I meant that the claim isn't convincing to me for the same reason that Lucky's speech doesn't demonstrate an intelligent speaker.


Why not get curious instead?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: