Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, it doesn't need to be any worse than the stack-based implementation of a recursive tree traversal, and it can't be significantly better. You have to store that state somewhere.

Perhaps it can be optimized to be a little better than the recursive version, depending on how much overhead your language uses for a stack frame that it won't need for this special case.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: