Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I do this with just a prompt setting context of the meeting if we have it, explaining this is a spoken meeting between n people, and asking to correct based on the entire context, acutally works decently out of the box.


Damn, I just tried this with ChatGPT (warning: contrived example) and it works surprisingly well:

PROMPT:

The following is a partial transcription of a meeting at a tech company. Please correct any transcription errors, using clues from context as well as the fact that this is a technical meeting.

Person A: we shouldn't use a sequel database to store this data, we probably want to use something Callum nor instead since it's more efficient than row-based storage. Something like a patchy park or arrow.

Person B: What's park, eh?

Person A: It's just a column-based storage format with efficient Jesus or snappy compression.

RESPONSE:

Person A: "we shouldn't use a SQL database to store this data, we probably want to use something columnar instead since it's more efficient than row-based storage. Something like Apache Parquet or Arrow."

Person B: "What's Parquet?"

Person A: "It's just a column-based storage format with efficient GZIP or Snappy compression."

EDIT: mistral 7B on the other hand botched this terribly, and made up a lot of nonsense unrelated to the transcript.


Yeah it’s pretty neat and can be improved with more context for technical terms. You do risk some hallucinations


Fantastic example.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: