Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The thing I find interesting / amusing about the "Guy Fawkes" masks from the movie, is the extent to which they have been embraced by at least 3 or 4 fairly different, even seemingly opposing, groups. Looking around, I've seen these masks associated with:

1. Radical libertarian / anti-government types

2. Tea Partiers

3. The OWS movement

4. Anonymous

The moral of this story may just be that these groups have more in common that you would suspect at first blush.



I've never seen the Tea Party associated with the Guy Fawkes mask. That seems... silly. Do you have a reference?

And as far as I know, OWS was never associated with the Guy Fawkes mask; that was Anonymous showing up in the flesh.


https://www.google.com/search?q=tea+party+guy+fawkes&tbm...

Why does it seem silly to you that the largest and most effective anti-government movement of the modern era would have some sympathizers who adopt the symbol?


Most of those pictures seem to be OWS related. Some of them are clearly Tea Party, though.

And to answer your question, because the Tea Party seemed to be all about being American and Fawkes was not only British but also Catholic. I guess pop culture helps.


I always picture the Tea Party folks more akin to the Michelin Man, from a physique standpoint.


They're all opposed to how the government currently operates. I think that's something that most of the country agrees upon.


But let's talk about birth-control.


Was this an attempt to illustrate "important issues" rather than promoting iconoclasm, or an attempt to say that wedge issues are what drives modern government and thus we shouldn't be paying attention to the man behind the curtain, but discussing the preselected moral issue dujour to keep us distracted and shoulders to the grindwheel rather than looking at the bigger picture?

The latter doesn't much look worth of downvoting to me, in fact I'd go almost so far as to say it's amongst the most vexing problems of humanity at the moment.


Thanks for actually replying.

Yes, my point (such as it was) is that wedge issues distract from the real "supra-partisan" issues that affect citizens across party lines, like the immunity of bankers from prosecution, how much of a drain military expenditures are on the economy (and therefor quality of life) in the US, the TSA, US foreign policy as a stifle on travel opportunities, and so on.

Oh, but let's talk about some religious people laying a turd of morality on the front page of every newspaper. Birth-control in church insurance? Such a pressing issue!


Namely: none of them have taken the time to learn about what a completely detestable theocratic proto-fascist Guy Fawkes was


But to their credit, that's not the point. This is touched upon in the novel--that it's the idea of rebellion that Guy Fawkes has become a symbol of, not what he was fighting for but that he was fighting at all.


Fuck it bothers me to no end how almost no one knows that side of the story. Keep telling it bro.


I think the word you are searching for is "anti-establishment". I think that one word characterizes all those groups.


Particularly amusing is that, at least in the case of Anonymous, the anarchistic end state of the graphic novel is fairly closely mirrored.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: