Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It has its rough edges, but I have to say that scrolling down the Timeline is a more personal and emotional experience than can be found anywhere else.


I have to disagree. Going through a photo gallery is far more emotional and personal than browsing a two column grid.


Your argument doesn't compute. You're comparing content (photo gallery) with a design structure. The "two column" grid includes photos, locations, new friends, comments, etc.


Perhaps I should've been more specific. His argument was that scrolling down timeline is one of the most emotional experiences.

Scrolling through a haphazard column system of photos of mishmash isn't that emotional to me. Going one by one through a persons Facebook album is more emotional to me because of the focus (one photo) and organization (I know which album I picked).


Photos are a pretty emotional experience, true. However I think there's a major difference. Typically photos on my facebook represent moments, short memories in time... mostly happy.

Looking at a photo makes me remember the context of the photo. However a status update is different. They're more frequent, they're less significant. They give context around the less important things.

For example, I remember the first time I looked at my timeline there was a status update that said something along the lines of "Oh man new doughnut at the Dunkin!" I wrote it a few years ago, and it was Completely pointless, and meaningless.. but then I remembered it, because later that day my mom was hit by a car. The entire events of that day flashed in my mind. Frankly that was pretty emotional for me.


I'm sure Facebook, just like google and twitter try to find and display only relevant. Nobody is perfect




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: