Interestingly, she doesn't mind the fact a model was created so much as the commandeering of her name and identity associated to it. Literally everything it produces is associated to her ... whether it's beautiful pictures or CSAM.
In this respect I'm curious what right people have in general to object if someone falsely associates your name with something. It's not even an AI question really. If I create a different kind of morally objectionable software under the name "Elon Musk" and represent that it embodies his style and personality, can he object to that? If I run a brothel under his name? At what point are natural names effectively implicit trademarks where the person inherits some kind of legal right to control or object about how it's used?
In this respect I'm curious what right people have in general to object if someone falsely associates your name with something. It's not even an AI question really. If I create a different kind of morally objectionable software under the name "Elon Musk" and represent that it embodies his style and personality, can he object to that? If I run a brothel under his name? At what point are natural names effectively implicit trademarks where the person inherits some kind of legal right to control or object about how it's used?