Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You have an unrealistically negative view of the legal system. Google cannot just file unlimited amounts of paperwork and expect either the judge of the opposing attorneys to review it, if they tried the judge might well sanction them, but also it would just cost Google a lot of money for no benefit.

You can go look at cases involving Last Name v Alphabet on the recap archive, they are typically represented by a single attorney. Below are a few examples, I manually filtered out pro-se actions with no attorneys, and class actions, but other then that just went through the list of cases looking for cases with titles fitting the format:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8060229/parties/el-mawa...

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6237000/parties/gottlie...

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8054663/parties/olson-v...

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8067002/parties/lee-v-g...

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8133814/parties/kaufman...



> You have an unrealistically negative view of the legal system.

Your links would be more convincing if some of these were successful, completely cases.

The question is not, can you sue Google/Alphabet without a team of lawyers, but can you _successfully_ sue them.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: