It requires all drug companies to have at least an internal conspiracy to suppress the results if HIV vaccine research - we know that they are investing plenty of money into the research from publicly available figures, so the implication is that they will be either suppressing the results or tampering with research to make it fail.
> As far as I'm aware, there's no expensive drug that suppresses Ebola symptoms.
"In the light of this I find it very surprising that drug companies haven't developed a drug that allows them to charge people $1000++ a month for drugs, for the rest of their life, isn't that a better business model? How on earth did the companies allow this vaccine research to escape?!!
Dude, what's with the snark? Can't we have a civilized discussion? You had a point there, but I'm not really inclined to engage with you after the last thing you said.
> As far as I'm aware, there's no expensive drug that suppresses Ebola symptoms.
"In the light of this I find it very surprising that drug companies haven't developed a drug that allows them to charge people $1000++ a month for drugs, for the rest of their life, isn't that a better business model? How on earth did the companies allow this vaccine research to escape?!!