"Dark forces" like people commenting here with anonymous brand new created accounts, slandering people who were tirelessly supporting Bitcoin long before they ever heard of it?
> people commenting here with anonymous brand new created accounts
I don't think those kinds of comments are warranted here. I don't see any increase in the number of green usernames in this thread compared to any other post. What kind of evidence do you have to support these claims?
Seems this thread is bizarro land. I guess you're going to just ignore the abusive conspiracy theory in the post that I was responding to and instead wag your finger at me for turning it around with a pretty obvious observation?
I browse both sites daily and see links between the two quite often. What is strange about one site linking to another?
Also I don't know if it's HN formatting but the commands you posted don't work. I think you're trying to point out there are N number of new users in this thread?
It's saying at the time I commented there were 35 posts in this thread with green names (36 now), while there were 0, 1, 1, and 1 in the other threads respectively.
If you want to go by the ratio of unique green names instead of posts this thread has 13 times more than those threads that had any at all.
There does seem to be a lot of variance in that though. The top post on HN right now is from a green user name. Also the number of comments in the two threads is vastly different.
Attacking my account age is so off-point. Greg's specialty is using true facts to try to claim or imply false information. I am new to this forum. He knows I am not as new to standing up to his form of dishonest distractions used to derail conversations he knows are bad for his house-of-cards.
If I remember right, you came to destroy P2P cash later than I began following it. Regardless, your "tireless support" has been a pox on the real bitcoin and the real bitcoin community you and your army pretend you represent.
Come on.