Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So, a point irrelevant to any part of the actual discussion.


I said.

You’ve never been able to buy commercial video without copy protection. Even in the VHS days you had Macrovision.

That statement is factually correct.

The reply:

Not true. Perhaps you meant to say that copy protection has existed for a long time. But plenty of commercial video has been available without copy protection.

Which is factually incorrect.

The reply:

I copied in the 2000s using whatever generic DVD ripper was available for windows at the time. I recall once or twice being unable to rip a DVD for copy protection reasons but it was rare.

Since even the oldest Windows dvd copy programs like DVDRipper could crack DRM doesn’t prove anything...

Are you now saying that being factually correct is “irrelevant”?

But using programs and devices that removed copy protection somehow proves that it didn’t exist?


It's definitely factually incorrect that all VHS tapes had macrovision. I know we did not have any kind of stablilizer or special copy machinery used to duplicate VHS tapes.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: