Devils advocate -- if I write a poem for instance, and post it online, then copyright law still gives me control over uses of that information. People don't have the right to do whatever they want with that info. Is this so different?
Similarly, companies often include EULA and shrinkwrap contracts governing what users are allowed to do with information accessed on their webpages. So why can't users collectively write a similar contract pointing the other way?
Similarly, companies often include EULA and shrinkwrap contracts governing what users are allowed to do with information accessed on their webpages. So why can't users collectively write a similar contract pointing the other way?