Because it amplifies how much is given in total? If after the campaign they still have more to give they could always give the remaining?

Not sure what you are saying exactly, but

> the legal protections for the consumer is much higher

You know you give away the right to file class action law suits against Anthropic when you accept their Terms Of Use, right? (at least the Americans ones)

Is that the case with enterprise contracts as well? Can’t imagine any decent procurement / legal team accepting this.

> In the Admin panel[links to the admin panel], open the Privacy menu in the left-hand navigation bar.

Why not link to the https://admin.mistral.ai/plateforme/privacy panel directly

"Why your *shell* is the real superpower behind coding LLMS"

My bad, You are technically right.

How is your tool different from the other bazillion similar tools of the same category?

Most open source tools parse the code into graph even open source tools with 100k stars do the same AST parsing only.

We record why each change was made, written back by the agents as they work, so the graph gets better the longer you use it . You can even check out the dashboard that is always in synch with Commits and updates from GitHub and Gitlab .

We especially flag the stale files and code and derank them in internal . So, Graph stays in synch and updated .

Token savings are in range of 78 to 99.74 percent .

API as a source of distribution is much more scalable and comfortable as well especially if user is actively engaging with multiple different Agents Eg you use Claude code ,codex or grok build for a single repository .

It's also better that the other browser in many ways. The "Awesome Bar" among them.

What's different about the Awesome Bar from Chrome? IIRC Chrome had the unified search/URL bar before Firefox did, and I don't remember it being very different from Firefox's implementation. If anything, I remember it being easier to add search engines in Chrome (unless it's gotten worse in the past few years since I switched to Firefox).

Am I missing out on cool features of the URL bar in Firefox?

Edit: made my question more specific

Among other things, it's less about searching the web, and more about reliably surfacing your history and bookmarks and already open tabs.

This is what bugs me every time I have to use Chrome. I know why Chrome does it, it has every incentive to put people through search at every opportunity. There is no way to put results from the history on top.

But you can do that in Firefox.

Not sure if chrome has an equivalent but FF bar allows limiting results, e.g. adding a single % in the bar will search tabs, ^ history, * bookmarks, (+ searchs tagged bookmarks? there's no shiny icon)...

Worth knowing: you can also use @tabs, @history, @bookmarks, etc. now. Way easier to remember :)

You can start typing words that were in either the title or the URL of some thing you vaguely remember visiting last month, or last year, and the Awesome Bar will reliably surface it for you. I hardly even use bookmarks; I just count on the Awesome Bar finding everything for me. If I had to choose between it and uBlock Origin, I wouldn't even have to think twice. Ads I can deal with, if I have to. I've been outsourcing my memory for the web to the Awesome Bar for decades. It's part of my brain.

I'm sure it varies from person to person, but I find it very frustrating to use Chrome's equivalent of the "Awesome Bar" when I'm forced to (eg work computer); Firefox just seems to do a much better job of surfacing open tabs (yes, I'm a tab hoarder), bookmarks, history, etc while Chrome seems like it'll surface some dubiously relevant options and try to railroad you into search. Even when I know I have a tab open and I know the domain name or a substantial chunk of the title it is legitimately rare for Chrome to offer to switch me to that tab, and often times it will surface one or two tabs that seem utterly unrelated. Bafflingly bad performance from what used to be a search company.

I know Chrome's address bar also does searches, but somehow I find it much worse at actually finding what I want. It's perhaps unfair since I use Firefox much more, but I visit some pages regularly in Chrome and I'm 90% sure suddenly it doesn't find these - or they are just ranked way off.

Firefox also find open tabs (so you can jump to the open tab instead of opening a new tab) and allow you to explicitly search for bookmarks, open-tabs etc. The open tab thing is also nicely integrated with Firefox sync (not sure if Chrome has something similar)

Firefox doesn't report every keystroke put into the Awesome bar back to Mozilla, AFAIK.

It does (to the search engine you use) unless you turn off "Show search suggestions in address bar results".

I don't think you can turn that off in Chrome

I was very narrowly asking about the "Awesome Bar", the example the GP comment mentioned as being better than Chrome.

I might be the odd one out but I hate the awesome bar. What I do like about Firefox is I can make the awesome bar just a boring address bar and have a separate search bar.

middle mouse click auto-scrolling too!

IIRC you give up the right to form class action suits by accepting the terms of use?

A workaround is to use shift + mouse drag to enter terminal native selection mode. (Works in most terminals I believe)

That's fine until what you need to copy gets extra line-breaks inserted

cargo_min_publish_age RFC: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs//3923-cargo-min-publish-age...