I would go one step further with "Name and describe a few candidates that conform to this recommendation" and watch it enthusiastically hallucinate candidates.
I believe it'll get there one day. But it's pretty clear we're still at "incredible toy" stage.
Exactly. I think of a Meta-like hole that you shout into, and no response comes back. Even for insurance claims. It's inherent to the technology. Google and every other big corp is like that online, too.
I have a theory that Trump not only boycotted the dinners for a few years because he's so fragile about things said about him, but mainly because he is self conscious about this: He has no idea how to make or interpret a joke. That's why he does accordion hands and repeats his quips so very often. It worked in the old movies people laughed at back in the black-and-white days! He doesn't know how dull or stupid he sounds because he very much does not understand humour. He only (fake) laughs when safe people around him laugh. And he is acutely aware of that.
People who exercise regularly have a lower resting heart rate. You can likely remove 10,000 heartbeats per day just by doing 20 minutes of exerciser per day.
I don't believe the limited heartbeats theory, but it does support the idea of exercise.
That's interesting. I got an error, "We’re so sorry, but the image we created may violate our guardrails around nudity, sexuality, or erotic content. If you think we got it wrong, please retry or edit your prompt." that makes me really want to know what it came up with.
Confirmation bias. Simply repeating does the trick. The interesting part isn't that this error comes up. It's that it very often decides "weird" means "pornographic" and starts to generate such an image before catching itself.
I believe it'll get there one day. But it's pretty clear we're still at "incredible toy" stage.
reply