You got that right. Look at all these corps taking advantage of government socialism.
Why do we need institutional competition over facts of STEM?
Universities have become corporate job training centers, not places of higher learning.
They teach what industry seeks, and thus industry is subsidized through government expenditure and private debt.
This forum is remarkably ignorant of practical reality. Instead leaning into what are at this point banal and debunked myths
Anyone wants a shot at an economically comfortable life it comes with serious strings. And no guarantee the education or 401k will be worth squat in a decade
You also don't get ahead if you there's a perfectly valid reason outside of your control that prevents you from 'getting ahead', or makes it extremely unlikely. Most dictionaries would call those 'excuses'. And you especially don't get ahead if those valid reasons exist but are seldom discussed by the people with the most power to solve them, and are instead often reduced to 'excuses', 'lazyness', or any other straw man, like the one you're complaining about.
OP originally said it was expensive. She did not argue that it was easy or the person had free time.
That's a cute clip, but if you look at statistics you'll see Americans with less than a high school degree work on average 7.8 hours a day, and only 30% work on weekends and holidays.
Provide something to back up the claim that less educated Americans are working 3 jobs and that it's impossible for them to receive education. The evidence I provided to support my claim is not perfect but it's better than a video of bush making a joke
How exactly do you intend to fund the design, implementation, and ongoing maintenance of such a massive social engineering program?
Your anecdote doesn’t really mean much. “Significantly way better” is apparently still not enough.
Similar to why food stamps are cheaper than food education. The administrative burden is prohibitively expensive.
Let’s not consider the thesis at hand here; jobs aren’t the answer. That flies in the face of our corporate sponsored religion.
Of course believing that inherently threatens your status.
This site should best stick to discussion of technology. Whenever social topics come along, the community quickly reveals its ignorance of reality for the majority, and knee jerk defense of its status quo
>How exactly do you intend to fund the design, implementation, and ongoing maintenance of such a massive social engineering program?
Maybe take some money out of military spending? Educate the population, the economy soars, and then you can re-increase the military budget 30 years down the line.
Why do we need institutional competition over facts of STEM?
Universities have become corporate job training centers, not places of higher learning.
They teach what industry seeks, and thus industry is subsidized through government expenditure and private debt.
This forum is remarkably ignorant of practical reality. Instead leaning into what are at this point banal and debunked myths
Anyone wants a shot at an economically comfortable life it comes with serious strings. And no guarantee the education or 401k will be worth squat in a decade