It would be funny if the solution is for Greenland/Denmark to annex Canada as a workaround on paper.

Proposed new rule:

If there's no technical reason to fuck with the product I have already purchased access to, don't fuck with the product I have already received.

Thinking of installing cameras and need power, so at least PoE seems like a proper reason to run Cat 6 in 2026. Otherwise, I'd just invent a 12/24/48V power protocol and still having to do per-device WiFi setup.

The nice thing about others taking photos, is that I can focus on the odd ones. I have photos of really well made knots on a guiding rope, and street gutter stones.

You wanna see what Venice looks like in general? Just go on Tiktok; they have better equipment anyway. You wanna see, up close, the nicely carved gutter stones that handles water without breaking the stone pattern? I'm your photographer.

> the doctor will be glad too.

So even the doctor forgot what they had talked about, and assumed the transcription was right? Crikey.

You always end up with the people pushing these foods being those who sell them. And then others start selling fake foods with similar claims.

For the "eat to get slimmer" claim, I think we're at the point where "extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof."

> You always end up with the people pushing these foods being those who sell them.

What do you mean by "these foods"? Just buy unprocessed food and 99% of the problems disappear. There is no fake, no people trying to sell you these out of malicious intent. Just buy local food people had access to in 1900 and you'll cure all your problems.

Foods that claim to lower weight or fix your heart disease risk.

So the metric GP is after is credit used per credit user? Normalizing the effect of an increase in credit users, and not assuming it's uniformly distributed.

Seems simpler to just publish the delinquent debt separately.

Consumer credit % used of credit available.

I mean you might also think the banks are issuing a bunch of dumb credit, but that suggests a problem with their financial state, not consumers.

If there's no explanation of why the 70+ bucket has so much larger CI band, having that dominate the totals seems like very fair critique. At the very least, they should have presented another totals with the outlier removed to show the impact.

It builds corporate value. If you end up with a portfolio of patents that someone might want to acquire, you've just created a new market for your company. Individual software patents of common quality probably don't matter.