Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | flockonus's commentslogin

At the timestamp of the video, after the question she goes in length about the [mind boggling] settlement, limiting to 2h/day for under 18 years old is not too bad?

Yes, not too bad for a question the moderator didn't really ask. She's really good at diverting the topic to a less uncomfortable field. No wonder she's in charge of a platform with 3.07 billion monthly active users. Also note the tone and condescending attitude.

Not necessarily indicates any 1 thing; it can be fake job posts to signal growth, could be an extra picky hiring manager, even a decrepit company that forgot to close it.

I agree with that, just responding to the parent who wrote that their company keeps the hiring listed. So, in their case it's true but in other cases it is not.

I agree, I should have written a bit more, apologies.



As a developer I've only updated my Mac around release date once. Faced so many bugs and incompatibilities that now I wait at least 2 months so both Apple & third party iron out the kinks.

No question OSS is amazing, but this video is a satire at best. It doesn't take much attention to see the results on right vs. left side are significantly different.

Jev is not interesting if it's not "smart", a 1B param model is most definitely not smart.


It can be smart and not knowledgeable, as long as all the data is in the question you really don't need much in term of general knowledge, it might be even beneficial to stay on track. It mostly depend son what you do with it. For example in the doom demo I don't think you need astra level knowledge to know "enemy = bad" and "enemy is at my left = turn gun left"

Taking their spiel at face value, it's intended as a mimic of System One in humans. System One is also not smart.

Jev has a 32k context window. I doubt it's a large model.

Correct. Not to say we're getting into the weeds of probability here as well.

"What are the odds a thunder will strike in Paris at 1pm UTC of 2026-09-16" - that could be a 0.001 chance going from blind historical measurements; 0.01 if it's raining; or 1 or 1 after the date has passed.


"cyberattack" is indeed exaggerated. AI breakout risk most definitely isn't, specially given how their swarm did in fact hack HuggingFace not long ago.


It is exhausting to keep up with model releases yes, much like it was for a while during the Cambrian explosion of FE frameworks, eventually tech seems to work out to consolidation.

But more so it seems there is Fear of missing out (FOMO) in our behaviours. The reality is, if whatever model you are using are good for your purpose, well, keep on it.


No idea what you're trying to say... he's been directionally wrong for years as the article illustrates clearly.


Zitron's predictions have often been wrong; they've still been less wrong than those of the people who disagree with him.


Not really, not leading at any criteria, altho top 5 in most - https://arena.ai/leaderboard


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: