Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dockerd's commentslogin

Open to India location?


Minio is no longer maintained.


oh wow, another rug pull!!

So Ceph/SeaweedFS/RustFS/Garage are the alternatives I think


Correct, but RustFS is the only drop in replacement (just migrated) Garage and Seaweed are nice (didn't look into Ceph) but you have to re-ingest. RustFS was just plug and play albeit a few minor API differences.

Also Apache licensing gives some peace of mind after the musical chair license game before they finally landed on only paid AIStor offering.


Don't look into the news about rustfs from the last few months if you are happy with them. :)


there was the issue in Feb but it was resolved, something else newer happen?


Not that I know of but a lot of people took tat as a sign of extensive vibe coding and wrote Rustfs off completely. I personally installed seaweedfs, rustfs and garage at different points and plan on checking out rustfs again in the future. If anybody is interested, the most robust of them seems to be seaweed by the way.


Are there any plans to open the Senior Backend Engineer role to candidates in India? Currently, the Ashby link for this role doesn't list India.


Not at the moment, unfortunately. Our hiring plans are continually under review and may evolve, so I always encourage checking back every few months to see if things open up.


That was future option, now they are purchasing it.


Anthropic providing limited-time double 5-hour usage limits in Claude Cowork.


How do you share the context/progress of goal across agents?


I implemented a client for each so that the session history is easy to extract regarding the agent (somewhat related to progress of goal).

Context: AGENTS.md is standard across all; and subdirectories have their AGENTS.md so in a way this is a tree of instructions. Skills are also standard so it's a bunch of indexable .md files that all agents can use.


It's how they can lock more users into their eco-system.


I received an email mentioning that earlier cohorts are canceled.

Apparently, the earlier pricing was better for us as customers because I had the option to opt for a lower price, i.e $10 per month with a one month commitment and see how the platform evolves and then sign up for other models post testing as needed.

I am not sure how long this new cohort will take to fill now. A slightly better option (looking back) would have been to take multiple options from the customer list and start with the one that meets the threshold.


First, thanks for signing up early. It means a lot.

The $10/mo price needed 465 people to fill a cohort before we could turn on a single GPU. People signed up and churned while waiting, so we looked at the reservation pattern and determined 80 slots was optimal. This reflects in the new price and throughput.

We're considering a 1-week option so people can test it out before committing to a full month. Would that help?


You won't feel much difference in performance for the next 4 years but my guess is local LLM inference going to be much better post 3-4 generation.


@fasteddie31003 and @ghoshbinayak, Can you share the designs that you created?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: