Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | distortionfield's commentslogin

This is what pretty much every “lifehack” type of tip boils down to, btw lol

I guess I should add "for someone else". In that case it's just bad negotiating skills, but at the same time companies have a lot more bargaining power over individual employees, and it's especially bad in the software industry.

This is the real hidden cost of the bots. I absolutely loathe the human verification hoops I have to jump through now, more than anything else mentioned in this thread.

This is the company that literally hired the Pinkertons and has been repeatedly fined millions for labor related violations, up to and including union busting. Consider me not even an iota of surprised.


> Consider me not even an iota of surprised.

Yeah, I followed this link specifically to see how many folks are surprised that Amazon may have did yet another vile thing to their employees, and I'm not one bit surprised to find nobody surprised by it. LOL!


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Securitas_AB

I've gotta take the wind out of your sails a little bit on the "Pinkerton" name.


They still exist under the Pinkerton name, they’re just a subsidiary of Securitas AB:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinkerton_(detective_agency)

https://pinkerton.com/


Yes, people realizing that for themselves was the intent of my link. This discussion about trivia we're having right now is the only mojo left in the bottle.

It's the same parent company as the security guards at your local shopping mall. Pinkerton is like the "geek squad" brand of security.


The democrats are completely complacent right now. They don’t even want to pretend to fight anymore.


democrats thought they don't need competence as long as they have the "political correctness" magic wand.

Looks like they were wrong! Thankfully!


The causes of the subject of the article are inherently political. It absolutely is relevant.


I’ll never forgive the US for pulling out of the Paris accords after we had gotten China to come to the table. That was our moment to get a real grip on this problem and we blew it. It’ll never come back, I’m convinced.


Can we be more specific and say it was Trump who pulled the US out of the Paris Accord, twice.


It was the american people who voted in Trump twice!

So no.


Well, a tiny fraction less than half the American people, at least the first time?


All those who voted for him and all those who didn't vote against him are equally complicit


Why do you deny blaming Trump? Most other republicans wouldn't have done that. He's opened up a new ability to ignore standards of behavior, but without him I really think it wouldn't have happened. And average voters have never heard of treaties like that. They voted for idiocracy realized, and they got it, but they didn't know what they voted for.

So voters are responsible (and I never convinced my dad even to this day that trump was bad, how much am I at fault), but he's an out there candidate in many ways too.


Its not about not blaming Trump, its about making it clear that its also the fault of every US American to even allow this in the first place. Not standing up, not fightning against it etc.


I think that's a fair comment. We are all responsible for our collective actions as a country, even if we are a tiny voice in the nation, even if whatever side you are on is small. We can all dare to speak our thoughts to others, share our views.


In 2016 Trump got 46.1% of the popular vote vs Hillary Clinton's 48.2%.

Expressed as fractions of the total US population in 2016:

  - about 28.5% of the population was not eligible to vote (due to age or other reasons)
  - about 31.6% of the population was eligible to vote but did not vote for either candidate
  - about 20.4% of the population voted for Hillary Clinton
  - about 19.5% of the population voted for Trump
If approx 1 in 5 is 'tiny' then support for the alternative was also 'tiny'.


Honestly this seems like it would be a sick party trick. Combine with some strudel.cc and it could be pretty cool little setup.


Exactly! And ghostty shaders!!


> where the government doesn't just force harms on the public whenever it will make them more money and voter's concerns about health and environmental impacts are listened to.

This is exactly what just happened in Utah et. al. with the new Stratos data center under western liberal democracy, btw.


They already have a balanced budget, why would they need to cave to these corporations?


They only have a balanced budget until their deferred bills come due, bills deferred precisely so they can declare the budget balanced, bills such as paying pensions.


Isn't this a non-sequitur though? Artemis presumably doesn't have to actually load up humans on the rockets to flight test them.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: