Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Ringz's commentslogin

Why not London/UK?


Whats the difference between LS and LuLu. I have an old LS license and after I switched to LuLu I didn’t miss anything.



I once took a didgeridoo course and played for quite a while after that. One weekend of 2×3 hours of didgeridoo playing, and my nose was incredibly clear. Like never before and never again since.

By the way, you can practice circular breathing very well in the shower. Take water in your mouth and breathe in through your nose while simultaneously spraying the water out through your lips.


Ente Auth

is a good alter. Works perfect for me.


That’s exactly how I think, too. But at the same time, I like indentation in Python, because I would logically indent in every other language as well. In fact, I find all those semicolons and similar things at the end of each line completely redundant (why should I repeat myself for something the compiler should do) and I hate them. And that’s despite having experience with Modula and 10 years of C++. But when I look at Rust, I find the syntax simply awful. From an ADHD perspective…


fellow ADHD here. Rust feels like 'oh come on you want me to type all that?' I find Raku great, though


Not ADHD but 100% agree on rusts syntax. It's totally repulsive to me.


Uranium mines will become a problem if every country tries to make 25% of electricity with nuclear. Electrification of primary energy might even need more nuclear according to some pro nuclear people.

Many forget that while there is plenty of uranium on Earth, most of it occurs in very low concentrations. The lower the concentration, the higher the CO₂ emissions for the entire uranium chain from the mine to the fuel rod.

Meanwhile, renewable energies receive free fuel from the sun. They are already recyclable today and, with intelligent local and intercontinental grids, will also require fewer batteries for storage.


Again. Show us some peer reviewed studies for your claims. A simple search will show you that, according to dozens or hundreds of peer reviewed studies, research and real world examples, a 100% renewable energy solution is feasible.


The alternative is only renewables. And we don’t have to stop all industries for it.

Show us some evidence based and peer reviewed studies for your claims. Repeating the same old and scientifically unproved claims doesn’t help.


Why don’t you show your claims to be true?


And don’t forget they will get more expensive over time.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: