The benefit is that you don't have to solve one of the hard problems in computer science (naming things).

This seems like the LLM is vastly overcomplicating things. My entire Neovim config is a single 500 line init.lua and this is enough for LSP to work.

My nvim LSP config is 20 lines and mostly consists of "if you see X language, use Y program as LSP".

I also have been using the same LSP config for approximately 7 years.

I don't get the pain.

LLMs love overcomplicating things so that is to be expected.

It does (to the search engine you use) unless you turn off "Show search suggestions in address bar results".

I don't think you can turn that off in Chrome

The protests and killings were extremely widely reported at the time.

Without access to the Internet from the Iranian people, the media reach was limited. It was not widely reported.

I'm not sure why you think that when even the US President was tweeting about it

You should run away from React Native Desktop screaming. It's built on top of WinUI 3, and inherits all it's problems, while also being dramatically slower. Almost all functionality requires writing C++ code, and communicating between C++ and JS is a huge pain in the ass. Use QT instead.

And if you think using it will let you port your app to other platforms, think again. There's no drop-in compatible equivalent of RNW for Linux, and the version for Mac is even worse than the Windows version.

t. works on a huge app written with React Native Desktop

Thanks for the heads up! In all fairness, I'd probably run away from writing any more desktop apps!

I hope this is successful. Fake books are flooding online stores and if this was widely adopted I would certainly refuse to buy anything without it.

But unfortunately I think that's unlikely. Most authors will likely never hear about this. I assume there will be some kind of fee to participate, but this will discourage people from using it. And even if it takes off, the fake book authors will just slap it on anyway as I'm not sure what enforcement mechanism would be effective.

No AI period. As soon as you feed your writing into the slop machine it starts telling you how to make it more like slop (I know someone who's cowriting a book with ChatGPT - this is exactly the result.)

I'd rather read things with typos and bad grammar than read something copyedited by AI.

Can I use the sugestions in Google Docs? Is that an expert system or LLM?

If the machine can predict your writing, then so can the reader. Which means the reader is getting bored.

Take the Google Docs suggestion as a sign that you shouldn't be writing that sentence at all. Back off, and find a way to tell the story in a way that every sentence provides something new, exciting, and unpredictable.

If the suggestion is better than what you were going to write, take it as a sign that you're not ready to publish. Treat it as a lesson in how to write better, then start over when you're more skilled at the craft.

Much the same applies to all LLM writing. If it can write it, it probably shouldn't be written at all. If an LLM is writing your boilerplate code, it means that there's too much boilerplate in your system. Solve that not by letting somebody else write it, but by rebuilding the system so that it doesn't require boilerplate.

My errors are mostly missing s in verbs, like "The dog eat[s] a lot of meat." , also wrong prepositions like "I'm still thinking [in->about] the exam." and sometimes idioms. I like it [the free version?] as an advanced orthography/grammar corrector for details, not a whole rewrite.

I agree with you. I remember a recent discussion where someone "cleaned" the comment of other user using AI, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47201796 the cleaned version was soulless or as the comment says wooden.

EDIT: From a recent comment by myself:

> People here is friendlier when the author is in the comment section replaying questions.

This time I notice the error on my own, but I made similar silly mistakes in the past. Google Docs may show a line with a suggestion to fix it.

You can fix this by dubbing the vinyl onto a CD-R. It'll sound identical and you won't need to mess with the turntable more than once.

I thought the government was shut down? Why is this funded but not SNAP?

They should go back to the Windows 2000 theme, that was the best one.

They should go back to the Windows Vista theme, that was the best one. Liquid Glass proved it.